2005 Daewoo Magnus vs. 2002 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Magnus is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mahindra CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mahindra CL would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Magnus (111 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Magnus should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Magnus weights approximately 56 kg more than 2002 Mahindra CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Daewoo Magnus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Daewoo Magnus (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2005 Daewoo Magnus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Daewoo Magnus | 2002 Mahindra CL | |
| Make | Daewoo | Mahindra |
| Model | Magnus | CL |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
