2005 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 796 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Matiz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 112 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Daewoo Matiz | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Daewoo | DAF |
Model | Matiz | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 778 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2060 mm |