2005 Daewoo Rexton vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rexton is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Rexton (215 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rexton should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Rexton weights approximately 840 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Daewoo Rexton | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Daewoo | DKW |
Model | Rexton | Munga |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 74 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2010 mm |