2005 Daewoo Rexton vs. 2000 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rexton is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Daewoo Rexton. (215 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Daewoo Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Rexton weights approximately 432 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon.

Because 2005 Daewoo Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daewoo Rexton. (318 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daewoo Rexton.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Daewoo Rexton 2000 Ford Falcon
Make Daewoo Ford
Model Rexton Falcon
Year Released 2005 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3199 cc 3984 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 215 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 318 Nm 357 Nm
Torque RPM 4600 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89.9 mm 92.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 99.3 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1950 kg 1518 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2800 mm