2005 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (120 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac should accelerate faster than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (310 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (176 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Hac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. 2000 Volkswagen Hac has automatic transmission and 2005 Daewoo Rezzo has manual transmission. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Volkswagen Hac will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Daewoo Rezzo | 2000 Volkswagen Hac | |
Make | Daewoo | Volkswagen |
Model | Rezzo | Hac |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1381 kg | 1331 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2520 mm |