2005 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2010 Citroen C8
To start off, 2010 Citroen C8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C8 (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C8 weights approximately 298 kg more than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C8 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (145 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Daewoo Rezzo | 2010 Citroen C8 | |
Make | Daewoo | Citroen |
Model | Rezzo | C8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 162 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.2 seconds | 12.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1645 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |