2005 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2012 Citroen C5
To start off, 2012 Citroen C5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C5 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C5 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C5 (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (145 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Daewoo Rezzo | 2012 Citroen C5 | |
Make | Daewoo | Citroen |
Model | Rezzo | C5 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 162 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1602 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 71 L |