2005 Daihatsu Naked vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Daihatsu Naked is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 272 more horse power than 2005 Daihatsu Naked. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Daihatsu Naked.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daihatsu Naked, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 489 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daihatsu Naked. (108 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Daihatsu Naked | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Naked | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 597 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 101.2 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2750 mm |