2005 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Daihatsu Naked is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 159 more horse power than 2005 Daihatsu Naked. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2005 Daihatsu Naked.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Daihatsu Naked. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daihatsu Naked. (108 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Daihatsu Naked | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Land Rover |
| Model | Naked | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 659 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 222 HP |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2550 mm |
