2005 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo S60 (180 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2005 Daihatsu Naked. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2005 Daihatsu Naked. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 799 kg more than 2005 Daihatsu Naked. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Daihatsu Naked | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
| Model | Naked | S60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 659 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 180 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1609 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 67 L |
