2005 Dodge Caravan vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2005 Dodge Caravan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Caravan. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Caravan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 1251 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Caravan | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Caravan | 25 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 3310 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 196 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1707 kg | 456 kg |
