2005 Dodge Caravan vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Caravan would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 382 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Dodge Caravan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Caravan (285 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Caravan | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Dodge | Mini |
Model | Caravan | Countryman |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 47 L |