2005 Dodge Caravan vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Caravan would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 1020 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Caravan (285 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Caravan | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Dodge | Smart |
Model | Caravan | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 92 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 33 L |