2005 Dodge Charger vs. 1976 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2005 Dodge Charger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1044 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 2005 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1976 Renault Rodeo has manual transmission. 1976 Renault Rodeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Charger | 1976 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Charger | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1724 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2410 mm |