2005 Dodge Charger vs. 1978 Subaru 1400
To start off, 2005 Dodge Charger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Subaru 1400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1978 Subaru 1400 has manual transmission. 1978 Subaru 1400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Charger | 1978 Subaru 1400 | |
Make | Dodge | Subaru |
Model | Charger | 1400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1361 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |