2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1066 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Dakota | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Dakota | EJ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3703 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2680 mm |
