2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 667 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Dakota | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Dakota | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3703 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 91 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 64 L |
