2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 397 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (320 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (203 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Dakota | 240 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 2482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 76.5 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 54 L |