2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 1982 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1982 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1982 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 302 kg more than 1982 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (320 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lincoln Continental. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 1982 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Dodge | Lincoln |
Model | Dakota | Continental |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 96.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 86 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 87 L |