2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1378 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Dakota | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | Dakota | 9 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3703 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 38 L |
