2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 832 kg more than 1982 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Dodge | Zastava |
Model | Dakota | 132 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1098 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2560 mm |