2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 547 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Dakota | CJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3703 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 150 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2380 mm |