2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 2000 Mercury Mountaineer

To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2000 Mercury Mountaineer. (208 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 275 kg more than 2000 Mercury Mountaineer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Mountaineer (325 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Dakota.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Dodge Dakota 2000 Mercury Mountaineer
Make Dodge Mercury
Model Dakota Mountaineer
Year Released 2005 2000
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3703 cc 4014 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 325 Nm
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2200 kg 1925 kg
Vehicle Length 5560 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1750 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 3340 mm 2840 mm