2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 2001 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2001 Mercury Villager. (168 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 52 kg more than 2001 Mercury Villager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (320 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercury Villager. (271 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercury Villager.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 2001 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Dakota | Villager |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 3276 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 271 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2860 mm |