2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2002 Opel Omega. (143 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 467 kg more than 2002 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Omega. (300 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Dodge | Opel |
Model | Dakota | Omega |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3703 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 300 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 17.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1733 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 75 L |