2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Epica. (154 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Epica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 262 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Epica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (320 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Dodge | Chevrolet |
Model | Dakota | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 89.2 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 63 L |