2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 2011 Acura CSX
To start off, 2011 Acura CSX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2011 Acura CSX. (155 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2011 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 494 kg more than 2011 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (320 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Acura CSX. (188 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 2011 Acura CSX | |
Make | Dodge | Acura |
Model | Dakota | CSX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 188 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |