2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 2012 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2012 Chrysler 200 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chrysler 200 (280 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 23 kg more than 2012 Chrysler 200.
Because 2005 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chrysler 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2012 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 2012 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Dodge | Chrysler |
Model | Dakota | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3703 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 352 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1814 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 64 L |