2005 Dodge Dakota vs. 2012 Maybach 62
To start off, 2012 Maybach 62 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Maybach 62 (620 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 410 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1039 kg more than 2005 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Maybach 62 (999 Nm) has 679 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Dakota. (320 Nm). This means 2012 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Dakota | 2012 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Dodge | Maybach |
Model | Dakota | 62 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 620 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 999 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 2876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 6165 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1575 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 3828 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 110 L |