2005 Dodge Durango vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Dodge Durango is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Durango (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1158 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Durango (393 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Durango | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Durango | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2328 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 64 L |