2005 Dodge Durango vs. 2011 Chevrolet Matiz
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 4,702 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Durango (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1504 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Durango (393 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. (71 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Durango | 2011 Chevrolet Matiz | |
Make | Dodge | Chevrolet |
Model | Durango | Matiz |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4702 cc | 794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 71 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2279 kg | 775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 35 L |