2005 Dodge Durango vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Durango (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1077 kg more than 2011 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Durango is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Dodge Durango. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Durango (393 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (200 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Durango | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Durango | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 17.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2252 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 55 L |