2005 Dodge Durango vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Durango (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (211 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Durango weights approximately 858 kg more than 2012 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Durango (393 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi TT. (349 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Durango | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Dodge | Audi |
Model | Durango | TT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 349 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2328 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 60 L |