2005 Dodge Durango vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Durango (230 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2005 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Durango (393 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Durango | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Durango | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |