2005 Dodge Durango vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 5,935 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Durango weights approximately 649 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Because 2005 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (469 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Durango. (393 Nm). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Durango.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Durango | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
| Make | Dodge | Aston Martin |
| Model | Durango | Vantage |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4702 cc | 5935 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7300 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 469 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 91 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2279 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4382 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 16.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 80 L |
