2005 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan (181 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 1381 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan (285 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Grand Caravan | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 3310 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1881 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2060 mm |
