2005 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 834 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan (285 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (111 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Grand Caravan | Lynx |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 111 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1884 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2400 mm |