2005 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 564 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Grand Caravan | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3310 cc | 2259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1884 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2680 mm |
