2005 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 684 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan (332 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (260 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Grand Caravan | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Dodge | Mini |
Model | Grand Caravan | Roadster |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1929 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 50 L |