2005 Dodge Magnum vs. 1963 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2005 Dodge Magnum is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Magnum. (250 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Magnum. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 3 kg more than 2005 Dodge Magnum. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Magnum is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Jaguar MK X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Magnum will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Magnum. (339 Nm). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Magnum.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Magnum | 1963 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Magnum | MK X |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 3780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1887 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 63 L |