2005 Dodge Magnum vs. 1964 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Dodge Magnum is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Magnum is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Magnum. (250 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Magnum. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Magnum weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Magnum (339 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Falcon. (244 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Magnum will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Magnum | 1964 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Magnum | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3523 cc | 2890 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 20.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 700 kg |
