2005 Dodge Neon vs. 1962 Ford Consul
To start off, 2005 Dodge Neon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Consul would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1962 Ford Consul. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Neon weights approximately 409 kg more than 1962 Ford Consul. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Consul is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Consul. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (176 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Consul. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Neon | 1962 Ford Consul | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Neon | Consul |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 58.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 782 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2500 mm |
