2005 Dodge Neon vs. 1962 Vauxhall VX4
To start off, 2005 Dodge Neon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Vauxhall VX4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Vauxhall VX4 would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1962 Vauxhall VX4. (71 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1962 Vauxhall VX4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Neon weights approximately 395 kg more than 1962 Vauxhall VX4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Vauxhall VX4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Vauxhall VX4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Vauxhall VX4. (119 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Vauxhall VX4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Neon | 1962 Vauxhall VX4 | |
| Make | Dodge | Vauxhall |
| Model | Neon | VX4 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1505 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 79.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 45 L |
