2005 Dodge Neon vs. 1972 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2005 Dodge Neon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Holden Belmont (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Neon.
Because 1972 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Holden Belmont (229 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1972 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Neon | 1972 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Neon | Belmont |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 229 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2830 mm |