2005 Dodge Neon vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2005 Dodge Neon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Neon weights approximately 120 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Neon | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Dodge | Matra-Simca |
Model | Neon | Murena |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 91.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 81.6 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1051 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2440 mm |