2005 Dodge Neon vs. 1982 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2005 Dodge Neon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 55 kg more than 2005 Dodge Neon.

Because 1982 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Dodge Neon 1982 Ford Falcon
Make Dodge Ford
Model Neon Falcon
Year Released 2005 1982
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2425 cc 3271 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 230 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 228 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1315 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2830 mm