2005 Dodge Neon vs. 1984 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Dodge Neon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1984 Ford Mustang. (88 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Neon weights approximately 130 kg more than 1984 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Mustang. (161 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Neon | 1984 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2560 mm |