2005 Dodge Neon vs. 1984 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Dodge Neon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (230 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Neon weights approximately 450 kg more than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Neon | 1984 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Neon | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2420 mm |
