2005 Dodge Neon vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2005 Dodge Neon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Neon weights approximately 215 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Neon | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Neon | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 55 L |
