2005 Dodge Neon vs. 2007 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2007 Toyota Matrix is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2007 Toyota Matrix. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2007 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 184 kg more than 2005 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (177 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Toyota Matrix. (165 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Neon | 2007 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Neon | Matrix |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 165 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 91.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.1 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 50 L |